CarnotX document library
Explore the proposed method, its potential applications and the programme for independent scientific assessment. Start with an accessible presentation or go deeper into the scientific and engineering documents.
Choose an area of interest below. Open a document’s information page to learn more and find its access options.
13 documents · All documents
A critical comparison of non-isothermal reversible-cycle benchmark methods in scientific and technical literature with the proposed Clausius-based parent framework. Examines scope, overlap, differences and evidence for additional operational value.
For thermodynamics researchers, engineers and scientific reviewers
An accessible introduction to the proposed Carnot–Clausius relationship through the square–rectangle analogy, and why independent scientific assessment matters.
For an accessible first introduction
De Nederlandstalige presentatie over de vierkant–rechthoekanalogie, de voorgestelde Carnot–Clausiusverhouding en de rol van onafhankelijke wetenschappelijke toetsing.
For an accessible first introduction in Dutch
An introduction to the scientific question, established Carnot and Clausius foundations, the proposed framework and its potential relevance, without reproducing the complete methodology.
For technically interested readers
A concise technical account of the proposition, formal scope, qualification logic and claim boundaries to support initial specialist assessment.
For researchers, engineering educators and scientific reviewers
The complete controlled specification of the proposed method: assumptions, equations, scope conditions, qualification requirements and verification logic. Independent scientific validation remains pending.
For academic, editorial and specialist review
A technical methodology report on paired temperature–heat-duty trajectories, thermal mismatch and matching opportunities, distinguishing finite-conductance alignment from the reversible limit.
For engineers and technical researchers
An explanatory report exploring potential engineering applications, educational implications and research opportunities of the proposed framework. These possibilities are not independently validated outcomes.
For researchers, engineers, educators and potential partners
A preliminary scenario-based assessment of how validated cycle theory, Thermal Matching and engineering adoption could affect energy use and operational fossil CO₂. Distinguishes published case-level opportunities from conditional global scenarios and unproven methodological additionality.
For researchers, engineers, funders and policy stakeholders
A stakeholder discussion report identifying 724 evidence-supported textbook families across twenty selected publisher groups, with publishing exposure, curriculum connections and staged review priorities conditional on positive independent validation.
For researchers, educators and publishers
Evidence-based mapping of the higher-education landscape relevant to thermodynamic cycle theory: 3,799 providers across 42 partially counted countries, spanning engineering, applied higher education and the natural sciences.
For educators, researchers and education stakeholders
An illustrative European technical university case documenting institutional depth: 17 cycle-related course codes across six faculties over two academic years, including 5 with explicit Carnot content. Examines teaching, benchmarking and research applications without implying institutional endorsement.
For researchers, educators and scientific reviewers
The scientific question, proposed interdisciplinary programme and intended contributions for independent assessment. The proposal has been submitted to the Lorentz Center; assessment is pending. Workshop acceptance and scheduling are not yet confirmed; the programme and organizing team are being further developed.
For prospective scientific, industrial, educational and publishing contributors
Open a document’s information page for its contents, context and access options. Requests for the Formal Core, workshop proposal and evidence report are assessed individually through their separate request routes; submitting a request does not guarantee access.